Six percent is the average advantage that Piledriver offers over Bulldozer when both are in an eight core configuration, and clocked at 4Ghz. Retrieved from ” https: The changes over Bulldozer are incremental. Looking at our Counter-Strike: Sign up for free , it takes 30 seconds. Since my problem is the validity of documentation out there, please don’t just point me at some document unless you know for sure it is correct.

Uploader: Shakat
Date Added: 2 February 2012
File Size: 9.81 Mb
Operating Systems: Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads: 81262
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

Stack Overflow works best with JavaScript enabled. To make matters worse, before 8305 could rev Bulldozer, Intel already began shipping Ivy Bridge – a part that not only increased performance but decreased power consumption as well. Email Required, but never shown.

assembly – what instruction sets in piledriver but not bulldozer – Stack Overflow

Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. The Bulldozer CPU cores that were bundled into each Zambezi chip were hardly power efficient and in many areas couldn’t significantly outperform AMD’s previous generation platform.

The 6 and 4 core versions get boosts oor both sides, without increasing TDP. Piledriver is a light evolution over Bulldozer, so there’s actually no substantial increase in die area compared to the previous generation.

This later generation of Bulldozer core was codenamed Piledriver. All FX-series processors are unlocked unless otherwise specified.


AMD FX and FX Piledriver Review – TechSpot

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Add your comment to this article You need to be a member to leave a comment. Log in Don’t have an account?

Following Bulldozer’s mediocre reception, AMD insisted that the new architecture was still young and would serve as a “solid building block” for the FX series. Moving to our Paint. Komodo was to launch in on the FM2 socketbut this never happened. The confusion piledriiver especially common with regard to the various recent bit manipulation instructions and instruction sets, and the FMA3 and FMA4 instruction pilsdriver.

Unfortunately, Bulldozer wasn’t all it was cracked up to be.

The FMA4 instructions are a lot ublldozer efficient for my purposes, because I didn’t have to write over any operand. My hope is that future derivatives of the FX processor perhaps based on Piledriver piledrivr boast much more aggressive Turbo Core frequencies, which would do wonders at eating into that advantage.

Does Piledriver deliver where Bulldozer fell short? Retrieved from ” https: Thomas Ryan is a freelance technology writer and photographer from Seattle, living in Austin.

The Vishera Review: AMD FX-8350, FX-8320, FX-6300 and FX-4300 Tested

Retrieved 11 March On a high level, Vishera looks just like Bulldozer. Its performance fell short of the then 9-month-old Sandy Bridge processors and in some cases, even failed to surpass the Phenom II range. GCC follows the same semantics. The Bulldozer based FX had a 3. This newsletter may contain advertising, deals, or affiliate links. Moving to gaming benchmarks we tested out two contenders in three games today; Crysis 2, Counter-Strike: At a high level, Vishera swaps out the Bulldozer cores from Zambezi and replaces them with Piledriver.


Multiple executives have fled the company, margins have tumbled, and long-term prospects are dim, at best. The K suffix denotes an unlocked A-series processor.

Are you sure you are using FMA3 on Bulldozer? There’s no on-die graphics for starters. Six percent is the average advantage that Piledriver offers over Bulldozer when both are in an eight core configuration, and clocked at 4Ghz.

When AMD created Bulldozer, it promised that it could offer strong scaling while bullldozer core resources. Bulldozer’s floating-point unit featured a complete redesign with improvements to support many new instructions while also allowing resource sharing between cores.